The Science of Disagreement
For decades, we've treated disagreement like a problem to solve. A sign that something's broken. But what if disagreement isn't the enemy of team effectiveness? What if it's the engine?

Most teams fail not because they disagree too much or too little, but because they lack the skills to disagree effectively
The benefits of disagreement
Brainstorming solutions to wicked problems, avoiding costly errors, and staying ahead of the game require us to speak our minds. And when smart people think hard, disagreement is inevitable. Simply put, if nobody disagrees, talent is being wasted.
Research shows that teams make better decisions when members disagree but give serious consideration to each other's views. Speaking up and challenging the consensus generates new ideas, helps avoid disastrous mistakes, and builds trust.
Disagreement is the engine that keeps a great team reaching for more.

The real competitive advantage
Disagreement isn't about being difficult. It's about respecting your colleagues enough to consider their ideas, find the good and debate the bad. When done well, disagreement:
Telegraphs respect.
We don't bother disagreeing with people we don't take seriously. When you disagree, you show others you are considering their views.
Builds trust.
Teams that can handle hard conversations trust each other more, not less. Because they know no one's pretending.
Accelerates learning.
Nobody is right all the time. The best mechanism to prevent costly errors is making sure that people speak up when something seems off.

Why teams don’t disagree well
Decades of research show that people are wrong about disagreement. Rather than thinking of disagreement as a catalyst of novel ideas, we fear that it will lead to conflict - raised voices, damaged relationships, and career sabotage. Most of us don’t speak up because it's just not worth it.
But when teams avoid disagreement, they don't actually avoid conflict. They just push it underground. Ideas go unheard. Assumptions go unquestioned. Frustration mounts.
Some people do take risks, often bringing passion and candor to the conversation. They may play “devil’s advocate” or raise challenging questions, hoping to encourage critical thinking. But, if the tone feels adversarial, others might pull back even more.
So what’s worse? Too little disagreement? Or too much?
The real issue is a shortage of constructive disagreement - the skill of speaking your mind with both honesty and grace to leverage diverse ideas without getting mired in conflict.

The science of what works
Constructive disagreement isn’t about finding compromise or becoming a better person. It is about knowing your goals and driving toward them with intention and clarity.
Is your goal:
- To prevent conflict escalation?
- To understand your counterpart’s view?
- To prevent a disastrous mistake?
- To weigh multiple approaches?
- To strengthen a relationship?
- To challenge an assumption?
Knowing your goals and developing a conversational strategy for reaching them prevents unforced errors. No more suppressing dissent out of fear. No more flying off the handle out of frustration. Our evidence-based framework trains your team to enter every conversation with intention, secure in the knowledge that they can navigate safely to the other side.

“We left with not just new skills, but a shared language and approach that will strengthen how we communicate and collaborate as an organization”
Transform disagreement into opportunity
Unlock the power of productive disagreement today.